Re-assessing Jinnah, like by no means earlier than

Ira Pande

The determine of Jinnah has at all times fascinated me. His spare, austere body, his vainness relating to garments (Savile Row fits or sherwanis and karakul cap), his legendary romance with Ruttie (the attractive daughter of Sir Dinshaw Petit, a Parsi grandee and a number one social determine in erstwhile Bombay) and their elopement — all these are tales that we had heard from our mother and father’ technology. Of course, for a lot of of that point, Jinnah was the stubborn one who insisted on partitioning the subcontinent. Both India and Pakistan subsequently created their very own icons, so whereas Gandhi turned the Father of our Nation, Jinnah was honored as Qaid-e-Azam in Pakistan. Of the function of the Congress and of Gandhiji, there was hardly any point out of their story of the Independence motion.

This sanitising of historical past was not restricted to our Independence motion alone; in a theocratic nation like Pakistan, any point out of Buddhism or Hinduism, even Sikhism, was fastidiously excised. The consequence was that generations of Pakistani kids had been fed a distorted model of contemporary historical past the place the Mughal Empire was positioned above Maharaja Ranjit Singh’s Sikh kingdom, that was far larger than the Mughal Empire and stretched proper up to what’s now Afghanistan and Balochistan. However, whereas historians battled over the Partition, debating whether or not Nehru was answerable for bartering away such an essential a part of the subcontinent and weakly accepting Mountbatten’s plan of carving up Bengal and Punjab, the ties of blood and the net of recollections that sure the 2 nations collectively by start might by no means be resolved satisfactorily.

The violence and bloodshed that adopted the Partition had been buried deep into particular person recollections and even supposing this was presumably the biggest migration of human beings ever seen by the world, little was accomplished to actually recount the occasions. Selective excerpts of the huge literature within the nationwide archives of the 2 nations and the India Office Library had been periodically mined to go well with the theories that varied faculties of historians upheld.

Just just lately, an astounding e book on this topic was launched by Penguin Random House. Its title is ‘Jinnah: His Successes, Failures and Role in History’ and its writer, Ishtiaq Ahmed, is a Pakistani historian who now lives and teaches in Sweden’s Stockholm University. A cousin despatched me an enchanting interview with the writer and I used to be riveted by his revelations. Ahmed doesn’t duck away from answering uncomfortable questions on how and why Jinnah pursued his dream of a separate homeland for Muslims, regardless of being no nice believer in Islam or theocracy. His eclectic tastes in food and drinks had been by no means hidden and the truth that he married a Parsi woman younger sufficient to be his daughter and never a Muslim lady had been acts of defiance towards the orthodox views held by his household and friends. His passionate espousal of federalism, his early affiliation with the Congress (to not be confused with the sorry remnants of it at this time) and his function in persuading Muslims to hitch the liberty motion don’t match comfortably together with his later emergence as a tough and rigid votary of a ruinous two-nation idea.

Ahmed has sourced his e book on an enormous quantity of analysis that features Jinnah’s speeches, the de-classified papers of the time containing the confidential communications despatched to London by Lord Wavell, Radcliffe and different dramatis personae, Mountbatten included. He additionally critically examines the pogrom launched towards the Sikhs by the Muslim League and thinks that one of many biggest errors that Jinnah made was to alienate the Sikhs perpetually. Jinnah’s calls for for sections of Gurdaspur and Pathankot to be awarded to Pakistan had been refused and doubtless led him to declare that he had inherited a ‘moth-eaten’ nation when Pakistan was fashioned. Ahmed examines all of the successes and failures of Jinnah to critically assess his function in shaping Pakistan that’s now nearly universally thought to be a nation hovering on the point of failure.

The e book is sure to lift a storm, for a number of revered Pakistani historians, together with the celebrated Ayesha Jalal, have printed a really completely different model of the story of Partition. I can’t wait to get my palms on it and place it towards one other e book on Jinnah that my pal Sheela Reddy wrote a number of years in the past, known as ‘Mr and Mrs Jinnah’, the place she analysed the non-public lifetime of the chief who emerges as a lonely, remoted man doomed to drive away all these he cherished.

It was whereas studying Reddy’s e book that paperwork the romance of Jinnah and Ruttie that I found they’d run away to Nainital for a secret honeymoon and stayed in a home that’s buried within the dense forests of the city’s Ayarpata. I clearly recall that home for it belonged to my aunt, whose husband should have purchased it from a departing Englishman. So, in a really convoluted approach, I’ve a stake in understanding extra about Jinnah. He and I share a karmic historical past, so to talk.

To flip to a different book-related subject: the brand new shortlist for the distinguished Booker Prize has simply been declared and Dubai-based Indian author Avni Doshi’s debut novel ‘Burnt Sugar’ options there. What can be shocking is that the bookies’ favorite, Hilary Mantel’s concluding quantity of her trilogy on Cromwell that was on the Longlist, has been dropped.

Be the first to comment on "Re-assessing Jinnah, like by no means earlier than"

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


%d bloggers like this: