EXPLAINER: What’s subsequent for WHO after US takes steps to remain

Geneva, January 21

The Biden administration has taken quick steps to keep the United States in the World Health Organisation and reinforce financial and staffing support for it — part of his ambition to launch a full-throttle effort to fight the COVID-19 pandemic in partnership with the world.

Biden, just hours after his inauguration on Wednesday, made good on a campaign pledge and revoked a Trump administration order that would have pulled the US out of the UN health agency this summer.

Early on Thursday, his top medical adviser on the pandemic, Dr Anthony Fauci, was dispatched to show new US support for the WHO.

Here’s a look at the UN health agency and its handling of the pandemic:


Established in 1948, the Geneva-based agency brings together 194 UN members under the founding principle that health is a human right.

Today, it counts over 7,000 staffers working in more than 150 countries.

It is the only health agency in the world with the authority to coordinate a global response to public health threats such as COVID-19, but also works on the gamut of health issues such as polio, maternal health care, tobacco and sugar consumption and even addiction to video games.

The WHO’s current two-year budget is $5.84 billion — about half that of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

The WHO is currently headed by Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus. He’s an Ethiopian microbiologist and malaria expert, who is both the first African to run the agency, and the first WHO chief who is not a medical doctor.

His first term is up next year and whether or not he gets a second could depend largely on who the US supports.


To be clear, the United States hasn’t left the World Health Organisation.

But the Trump administration, triggering a one-year notification process required by Congress, announced plans to leave on July 6.

The US also cut all funding to the WHO, stripping it of funds from the country that has long been — and by a longshot — its biggest donor.

The Trump administration faulted the agency for three main reasons: its allegedly slow response to the pandemic after it emerged in Wuhan, China, in late 2019; its alleged kowtowing to and excessive praise of China’s government; and administration claims that the WHO had criticised Trump’s suspension of entries of people from China to the US as the pandemic spread.

Officials at the WHO did raise questions about the use of travel bans — out of concern they might hamper medical aid efforts — but didn’t specifically criticise US policy.

The agency has been traditionally averse to public criticism of member states, particularly one as influential as the United States.

An Associated Press investigation last June found top WHO officials repeatedly lauded China in public even as they privately complained that Beijing was withholding critical outbreak data from them, including the new virus’ genetic sequence.

And a report issued to the media this week by a panel convened by the WHO concluded the agency could have acted quicker to stem the emerging coronavirus and might have labeled it a pandemic sooner.


The administration wants to show the United States resuming work with its international partners in health care after a largely go-it-alone approach under Trump.

In his pre-dawn address on Thursday to the WHO’s executive board, Fauci said the US would resume full funding for the WHO and maintain its staff support for it, while announcing the US will join its efforts to get COVID-19 vaccines, diagnostics and therapeutics to people in need around the world.

One of the key questions will be what kind of reforms — long sought by many member countries, health advocates and even some WHO leaders themselves — that the new administration might seek.

The WHO has numerous reviews in motion about its handling of the pandemic and how it can change to strengthen its ability to respond to future ones.

Fauci expressed support for the WHO reform but didn’t provide specifics.

The US has long played an outsized role at the WHO, including placing senior doctors in key positions and directing policies in programs ranging from AIDS to malaria to nutrition.

Biden’s decision to keep the US in the UN agency may lend some much-needed credibility to the WHO after it came under heavy criticism on multiple fronts last year. AP

Be the first to comment on "EXPLAINER: What’s subsequent for WHO after US takes steps to remain"

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


%d bloggers like this: