Sushant Singh Rajput’s ex-personal assistant: It’s inconceivable, he could not have dedicated suicide


New Delhi, August 12

While the controversy behind the loss of life of Sushant Singh Rajput is taking new turns on a regular basis, Ankit Acharya, who was the actors private assistant for over three years, on Tuesday mentioned that its “impossible” and that the late actor “couldn’t have committed suicide and this is clearly a murder”.

Speaking to IANS over the telephone, Acharya mentioned, “Sushant Bhaiya was a very happy-go-lucky man, and he could have never committed suicide. He was the person who used to motivate everyone and stress that ‘suicide’ is no solution and that one should always fight against the challenges of life. He could have never committed, suicide, it was clearly a murder.”  

“I worked as Sushant’s personal assistant from July 2017 till July 2019 though I’m not sure about the nature of my exit—whether I was sacked or not. I was responsible for everything, from his shoots to all his other work, I used to be with him 24×7. I used to take full care of him including his food, medication, appointments and everything else. It was more like being a family member,” Ankit mentioned. 

When requested as to who was behind this, Ankit mentioned, “Well, I can’t comment on it, it would be the best if investigating agencies talk about this.”  

“But, I tried to know more about his death, so I started to go into the depth, I saw that there were bruises near his eye. Secondly, the marks on his neck were not of the “inexperienced fabric” but are of the belt of his dog Fudge as the round mark is of the dog belt’s buckle,” he added.  

The ex-manager additional advised IANS that he was on go away when Rhea entered the late actor’s life. 

“Well, I was on leave when Rhea entered his life and I never had a face to face interaction with Rhea. Had I had one, I would have never let this (death) happen,” he mentioned.

 

“Before Rhea’s entry, Sushant Bhaiya was a very jolly person, he was always happy and motivating others. He used to play cricket with us; he also had a habit of writing poetry and posting it on Instagram. But since, Rhea came in his life, he lost that joy in his life,” Ankit narrated. 

Recalling his final assembly with Sushant, he mentioned, “I remember when I went to collect my last salary, his face seemed dull, and he seemed to have lost that joy. I wanted to meet him but then I thought I won’t be allowed to meet him, but, he waved back at me when I said bye.”

When requested in regards to the late actor’s relationship together with his household, Ankit mentioned, “I used to talk to his sister and brother-in-law who lived in Delhi every time they used to come to Mumbai. Whenever they used to come, Sushant Bhaiya was really happy, they used to have food together, talk and have a lot of fun.”  

“Since, Rhea came in his life, he lost touch with his family members,” he added whereas additionally saying that since she got here in his life, he appeared to have misplaced happiness.”  

While Ankit has alleged that Sushant was strangulated by his canine’s belt, Sushant father counsel advised the Supreme Court at the moment that the mark seen on the neck is a belt mark.

Sushant Singh Rajput’s father Ok.Ok. Singh advised the Supreme Court that Mumbai Police summoned everybody “except the real suspects or accused” within the case of his son’s loss of life, and argued that the mark seen on the actor’s neck may very well be of a belt.

“His daughter could enter the flat after the body was reportedly brought down. Nobody in the family has seen his body hanging,” senior advocate Vikas Singh, showing for the late actor’s household, argued. 

 

The Supreme Court at the moment reserved its order on Rhea Chakraborty’s plea for switch of the FIR lodged in Patna by Sushant Singh Rajput’s father to the Mumbai Police.

 

A single-judge bench of Justice Hrishikesh Roy famous that Rhea herself has pleaded for a Central Bureau of Investigation probe.

 

Both the Bihar authorities and Sushant’s father are looking for a CBI probe into the actor’s loss of life, whereas the Maharashtra authorities opposes it. The prime courtroom has requested all of the events within the case to file written submissions by Thursday.

The Bihar authorities alleged there was political stress to cease registration of an FIR in Mumbai and Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, representing the Centre, argued that the arguments made by the Chief Ministers of each Maharashtra and Bihar throughout the case makes it a match case for a CBI inquiry.

Rhea’s counsel, nevertheless, contended that the FIR in Bihar was on the behest of Chief Minister Nitish Kumar there, and if there have been to be a good investigation, it could possibly’t be on the occasion of Bihar Police.

Stressing that the switch petition needs to be allowed, Rhea’s counsel insisted that the efficient investigation needs to be in Mumbai, as it is usually the place of authentic jurisdiction.

Sushant was discovered lifeless in his flat in Mumbai’s Bandra on June 14. IANS 



Be the first to comment on "Sushant Singh Rajput’s ex-personal assistant: It’s inconceivable, he could not have dedicated suicide"

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


*


%d bloggers like this: