Tribune Web Desk
Chandigarh, August 28
Ankita Lokhande shared a “clarification” put up on Instagram after Rhea Chakraborty made allegations towards her throughout a TV interview.
During an interplay with Aaj Tak, Rhea mentioned that Ankita, in a number of interviews, claimed that she and Sushant had been in contact through the launch of ‘Manikarnika’, which in accordance with the Rhea was by no means the case.
Rhea had mentioned that Sushant had not spoken to Ankita over the previous 4 years.
To this, Ankita has issued an official assertion, saying that she had by no means claimed that she was in contact with Sushant after their breakup.
“1st of all from beginning till the end Sushant and I were together about 23rd February 2016. He never had any conditions of depression and had visited any psychiatrist. He was totally fine,” learn Ankita Lokhande’s assertion.
“Neither in any platform, I have ever said that Sushant and I were in touch with each other after our separation. Fact is what I have said while shooting for Manikarnika, Sushant has commented on one of my posters on a friend’s Insta post, Mukesh Chhabra, he just wished me luck for the project and in a courteous way, I replied. So I deny Rhea’s claim that I have said we spoke on the phone.”
“In fact what I spoke about in the interviews till now, the time Sushant and I were together, he was never in any kind of depression. We saw dreams together for his success and I prayed, and he succeeded. This is all I have said. I clearly mentioned if any of the questions were being asked to me about Rhea. My replies were honest that I really don’t know her and about their relationship as I was hardly bothered. I only got bothered when someone lost his life and if I was questioned about the time when we were together I will speak honestly and reveal the truth,” the assertion additional learn.
Clarifying about her flat, which she earlier shared with former accomplice Sushant Singh Rajput, Ankita Lokhande mentioned, “About the flat, I have already cleared and family has no different opinion opposite mine. So I still sticking on grounds of truth and accept that I have been standing on the family’s side, not Rhea. In the family’s knowledge and understanding, she is the one who persuaded him towards his end. And they have chats and proof which can’t be denied and overlooked too. So I heard the family’s side, stood by it, stick by it till the end.”