Vacancies in Excessive Courts

More than five years after the Supreme Court struck down the National Judicial Appointments Commission to safeguard judicial independence, the collegium is struggling to fill judicial vacancies in the 25 high courts. A Bench headed by Chief Justice of India SA Bobde has frowned upon the government for delaying the process of clearing the names recommended by the collegium for appointment as high court judges. Terming it a ‘matter of great concern’, it has asked the Ministry of Law and Justice to spell out how much time it would take to process the recommendations.

As on January 1 this year, there were 668 judges against a sanctioned strength of 1,079 and 411 posts remained vacant. The situation doesn’t appear to have improved since January 2020 when judicial vacancies in high courts stood at 401. The Supreme Court has sought to put the blame on the government. More than 100 names sent to the Union Ministry of Law and Justice by various high courts to be forwarded to the Supreme Court collegium for approval are hanging fire, many of them for more than a year. There are 56.57 lakh cases pending in 25 high courts. Of this, 92,085 are more than 30 years old; 1,51,853 cases have been awaiting disposal for over 20 years.

The Memorandum of Procedure that governs the process for judicial appointments requires the Centre to give its feedback on the names recommended. Having been forced to play second fiddle, successive governments have used their feedback as a ‘pocket veto’. But the judiciary can’t be absolved of its responsibility either. If there are 411 vacancies in high courts, why can’t an equal number of names be recommended in advance? It’s time to fix the lacunae in the judicial appointment system in the interest of justice.

Be the first to comment on "Vacancies in Excessive Courts"

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


%d bloggers like this: